Articles > Mathematics > Biostatistics > Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics)

Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics)

Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) 



  • Wayne W. Daniel


  • Hardcover: 944 pages
  • Publisher: John Wiley & Sons; 8 edition (November 25, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0471456543
  • ISBN-13: 978-0471456544
  • Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 7.4 x 1.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 3.44 pounds


Book Description 

This classic text takes an applied and computer-oriented approach to its topical coverage. The book is intended for one or two semester courses in biostatistics at the undergraduate or graduate level offered by departments of biostatistics, statistics, mathematics, nursing and other allied health disciplines, and is also used in some departments of forestry and animal husbandry. Nearly all the examples and exercises make use of real data from actual research projects and reports from health sciences literature. Where appropriate, Minitab, SPSS and SAS commands and printouts are included as part of the examples and solutions to exercises.  

Book Info

Georgia State Univ., Atlanta. Package for advanced undergraduate and graduate students and clinicians. Text alone was listed in approval week 1998-45. –This text refers to the Hardcover edition. 

The publisher, John Wiley & Sons

Like its predecessors, this edition stresses intuitive understanding of principles rather than learning by mathematical proof. Provides broad coverage of statistical procedures used in all the health science disciplines. This version contains a greater emphasis on computer applications, and most of the statistical techniques include the MINITAB commands by which they can be applied. –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.  



Not as impressive as I first thought, September 23, 2005

Daniel obviously knows his statistics; but, I wouldnt think that is too helpful for individuals reading or studying from his textbook.
The reasons are numerous, and all these reasons would reduce anyone’s chances of solely using this book, or even using it at all.
The textbook is well organized, however Daniel’s writing often is pedantic, repetitive (not in the helpful way) and ambiguous at best.
The examples and solutions occassionaly have serious errors in them which affect the overall outcome of the test (A second consideration is that the book is in it’s 8th edition!!! therefore such errors are unacceptable for a person such as myself).
An example can be found on page 239 (example 7.3.2). The pooled variance, as calculated by Daniel is approximately off by 100 simply because he didnt give attention to dividing the numerator with the proper pooled D.F of the samples. The chapter ironically was on hypothesis tests, something extremely important to any line of empirically oriented statistics.

In Chapter 8; which is probably the most important chapter in Bistatistics (ANOVAs) he does not mention the relationship between MSW and sample SD. Also, his usage of Summation in formulas often are unnecessarily overcomplicated. Such is not even seen in professional journals.

I did like this textbook regardless of its many shortcomings, its not because I liked the author’s style of writing. Its more or less the fact that my lecturer (I assume) used this book heavily in his lectures and so I used it as a supplementary text.

I would suggest, Chap T. Le’s Introductory Biostatistics. However he goes too much into nonparametric methods and proportions and doesnt cocentration (to the degree I wanted) on continous data.

More robust and probably cost effect books are :Introductory Statistics for the Life Sciences by Samuels. But the Best book I have ever seen on the subject is "Introductory Biostatistics for the health sciences" By Chernick and Friis. The book is well priced and no portion of this book, I have seen as being useless.