Articles > General Biology > Evolutionary History of Life > Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong by J. Wells

Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong by J. Wells

Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong  

   

AUTHORS: 

  • Jonathan Wells 

PRODUCT DETAILS:

  • Paperback: 338 pages
  • Publisher: Regnery Publishing, Inc.; 1st Pbk edition (January 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN: 0895262002
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.0 x 1.0 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.20 ounces

 


EDITORIAL REVIEWS


Book Description 

Everything you were taught about evolution is wrong.  

CUSTOMER REVIEWS

Conversion of a former Darwinist, November 22, 2000

I must admit that reading this book was somewhat shocking. I had expected to see rehashed creationist arguments about the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record. On the contrary, nothing Wells says depends on creationist ideas. He has collected evidence from the mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific literature, and combined them into a compelling case against what we might call "textbook Darwinism." This might be a trivial accomplishment, since the record of high school and college textbooks is generally dismal. But his cumulative argument seems to me devastating to orthodox Neo-Darwinism, since it just is textbook Darwinism. Wells discusses the famous comparative vertebrate embryo diagrams– which should be an embarrassment to any textbook author who includes them–the fallacious way homology is used for evidence of common ancestry, the collapse of the story of Peppered Moths, Darwin’s finches, and many more pieces of the Darwinist lore. By the time I was finished, I had lost faith in almost everything I thought I knew about evolution. I now suspect that Darwin will soon join company with Marx and Freud.

I’m not sure what I believe at this point, but I can no longer buy the official story. I don’t know if I agree with some of Wells’ recommendations in his conclusion, but something clearly has to be done. Hysterical defenses of falsified "evidence" by Darwinian disciples at Talk.Origins and elsewhere convinces me that they didn’t see this coming, and won’t be able to deal with the actual facts involved.